The Sociological Imagination

Committing Sociology Since 2010

Home
About
Conferences
Digital Sociology
Interdisciplinarity
Podcasts
Public Sociology
Contact Us

Home › Rethinking The World › ‘We believe’ – but who are we? Margaret Archer on the Relational Subject

‘We believe’ – but who are we? Margaret Archer on the Relational Subject

By Mark Carrigan on March 6, 2015 • ( 0 )

Share this:

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Reddit
Tumblr
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Pocket

Related

« Fuller’s Law of Intellectual Influence

The Lure of Minimalism »

Categories: Rethinking The World

Tags: collective subject, critical realism, margaret archer, reflexivity, relational realism, relational reflexivity, relational subject

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 688 other subscribers

Email Address

Archives

Links

Billie Lister
Campaign for the Public University
CRIMSOC: the Journal of Social Criminology
Critical Realism
CSISP Online
Cyborgology
Digital Sociology
Everyday Sociology Blog
Films for Action
H-Net
Inequalities
LSE Impact Blog
Migrant Tales
Military Migrants
Public Sociology
Sociological Images
Thinking Culture
This Sociological Life

Tags

academia Academia 2.0 acceleration anti-marketization asexuality Audrey Sprenger austerity big data blogging BSA capitalism craft critical realism c wright mills data science digital sociology education employment ethnography gender higher education identity labour media neoliberalism Politics public engagement public sociology publishing quantified self Race reflexivity self tracking sexuality social media social ontology social theory sociological imagination Sociology sociology of sport Steve Fuller technology twitter visual sociology writing

Categories

Recent Comments

Purple Peppercorn on What does public sociology have to say about sociologists who are ‘merchants of doubt’?
Wander Nunes Frota on What does public sociology have to say about sociologists who are ‘merchants of doubt’?
This Week in #GraphicMedicine (7/7/17) – The Graphic Librarian on What is Graphic Social Science?
Nick J Fox on Theory as practice: for a politics of social theory, or how to get out of the theory zoo
wander nunes frota on The revenge practices of plutocrats
Terry Smyth on What is Graphic Social Science?
Why African Fans Love European Football: A Senegalese Perspective | on The deregulation of European club football and the Belgian football league
Why African Fans Love European Football: A Senegalese Perspective on The deregulation of European club football and the Belgian football league
Why African fans love European football - a Senegalese perspective | Wikipedia Editors on The deregulation of European club football and the Belgian football league
Jonathan Sobels on On the Spiralists

Recent Posts

A playbook for merchandising doubt
Brand Corbyn and Brand Trump
Ways of Being in a Digital Age – A Review Conference
Public Intellectuals and the Shock Doctrine
What does public sociology have to say about sociologists who are ‘merchants of doubt’?

If you see something on the site which you think shouldn't be here, get in touch and we'll try to resolve the situation immediately.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Opti by Pro Theme Design.

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address

Cancel

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.