Remembering Operation Spanner: Culture, Law, History and Crime
10th & 11th September 2015
Two interdisciplinary workshops at the University of Essex & Royal Holloway, University of London
Professor Ken Plummer (University of Essex)
Professor Carl Stychin (City University)
February 2017 will mark the 20th anniversary of the 1997 European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in the case of Colin Laskey, Roland Jaggard and Tony Brown v United Kingdom, ending the legal appeals for the defendants in R v Brown . A group of men were convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for engaging in ‘extreme’ sadomasochistic sex acts. None of the ‘victims’ of the ‘assaults’ were themselves the complainants, and in fact gave evidence of their consent to the acts. Moreover, the activities were undertaken in private without causing any lasting injury. An undercover Manchester Metropolitan police investigation of 1987 called Operation Spanner uncovered video evidence of the incident and the CPS made the decision to prosecute the assailants.
While legal scholars have interrogated the judgment by focussing on the deployment of consent, recklessness and the legality of sexual pleasure, a major interdisciplinary project that examines the wider and longstanding impacts of Spanner and the judgments has not yet been undertaken. The ruling was affected by and had wide-ranging impacts on culture more broadly, and its shockwaves continue to be felt today.
Two single-day seminars at Essex and Royal Holloway will be held on the 10th and 11th September 2015 respectively. The convenors intend that these intensive one-day workshops will facilitate discussion to determine the direction of a series of fundable research projects and outputs, and bring together an interdisciplinary cohort working on these topics in order to lead to published and other material outcomes.
We solicit papers and proposals for 20 minute papers which examine Spanner and its legacies from the time of the arrests to the present day in broader social, cultural and historical contexts, including but not limited to:
· criminological and criminal justice contexts
· performance art
· body modification, both professional and private
· Socio-legal and cultural regulation of bodies
· the “Video Nasties” panic of the mid-80s, cultural rhetoric of danger and contagion
· sexual subcultures, sexual rights and activism in the late 1980s and early 1990s
· pornography, particularly that classed “extreme” by recent laws
· political discourses on homosexuality, and sexual behaviour more generally
· Biomedical issues including HIV transmission, public health
We welcome proposals from the humanities and social sciences, including but not limited to sociology, law, history, criminology, art history, cultural studies, media studies, film studies, anthropology and geography.
Please send abstracts of 300 words (max) to email@example.com and ale