How many people saw this when it was originally on TV a few weeks ago? It’s a very interesting example of a high profile academic on mainstream TV. I thought he acquitted himself rather well, particularly given the consistent over simplification of his interlocutor. It would be interesting to get other people’s view points though. Did he do well? How could he have done better? Should he have been on the program in the first place? There’s a comments facility below the videos, although unfortunately it requires that you register.