January 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Month January 2012

Has the snow revolution donned a mink coat?

Elena Omel’chenko and Nastya Min’kova, MYPLACE team members at Centre for Youth Research, Higher School of Economics (St Petersburg) on the latest from Russia’s ‘Snow Revolution’  (27th December 2011)

This article was initially posted to the MYPLACE blog. For more information on the MYPLACE project, follow them on Twitter or visit the project’s website: HERE

The snow revolution in Russia continues. The pro-Kremlin movement activists are still searching for evidence of the involvement of the US State Department and the residents of Russia’s cities are attending protest meetings for the third Saturday in a row. Among them are many young people. Among them are many who regularly engage in street politics. But among them too are many who have never taken to the streets before. The following blog collates links to all communications about protest meetings in Russia and abroad which took place on 24 December:

http://podosokorskiy.livejournal.com/1426720.html#.

Moscow is beating all records: http://zyalt.livejournal.com/499063.html. On 24th December on Sakharov Square 50-100,000 people gathered. The figures provided by the city police and the by the meeting’s organizers vary significantly and this has become the source of much humour. The web columnist (at ru.net), Aleksandr Pliushchev, published in his blog photographs of various events from Sakharov Square  (http://www.flickr.com/photos/plushev/6564495887/). In the first case, the police estimated that there were more than 50,000 participants of the pro-Kremlin movement ‘Nashi’ while in the second, they claimed there were 29,000 participants at the opposition meeting.

The Moscow protest set the town for people’s creative input. Many placards took up the theme of ‘Putin and his condoms’ because, a day earlier, the Prime Minister had likened the white ribbons, which have become a symbol of protest against the dishonest elections, to contraceptives. On the 15th December, during a live TV broadcast and in response to a question about whether the ribbons might become a symbol of a new ‘colour’ revolution, Putin said, ‘Even though it is a little unseemly, I will tell you honestly that I thought they were promoting the battle against AIDS, that they were some kind of contraceptives’. At the meeting a group of young people distributed condoms under a sign saying, ‘You didn’t like that rubber?’ Pick another! You have a choice!’ [Translator’s note: in the original Russian this is a play on words since the word for ‘elections’ (vybory) is the plural form of the word for ‘choice’ (vybor).]

Another humorous theme have been source of humour has for jokes has been the ‘bandar-logs’ in reference to the same direct address to the people on the 15th December when Putin explained how he would work with the opposition by equating them to the ostracized anarchic ‘monkey people’ of Kipling’s ‘Jungle Book’: ‘All citizens must be treated with. Of course there are people who have Russian Federation passports but who act in the interests of a foreign state and using foreign money. We will also try to establish contact with them although often it is pointless or impossible.  “Come to me, Bandar-logs”. From childhood I have loved Kipling.’ The news site newsru.com created a selection of the funniest protest  materials:

http://newsru.com/arch/russia/25dec2011/saharov_creo.html (select ‘all photos’/ ‘ВСЕ ФОТО’).

On the tide of these feelings, there appeared on the official Russian prankster site, a recording of a conversation conducted by the prankster nicknamed Vovan222 with the head of the Central Electoral Commission, Vladimir Churov. The young man introduced himself as a well known Kremlin official and, on behalf of the ‘twins’ [Medvedev and Putin], told Churov he had been sacked. Judging by the conversation, the prank worked; Churov, whose responsibility it was to deliver the vote count at the elections, believed he had been fired. The audio file was quickly disseminated via the diaries of Live Journal contributors (http://www.livejournal.ru/themes/id/42793?from=twitter).

The authorities have responded already; some representatives of the Presidential administration have called people attending protest meetings ‘sympathetic’ or ‘worthy’. And recently Putin’s deputy, Sergei Ivanov, declared recent events to indicate ‘genuine freedom of speech’ in Russia. However, despite the protestors finally having been noticed, and even shown on central TV channels (previously the subject had been ignored), the authorities remain deaf to their demands. Dmitrii Medvedev has promised the people that he will restore some of their power to elect regional governors, but so far nothing more.

 

Breaking the ‘Fukuyama taboo’— a journey through the global crisis with Slavoj Žižek.

Love him or hate him, Slavoj Žižek is no ordinary thinker, with a reputation for his always provocative and take-no-prisoners approach to social analysis. In an interview for Al-Jazeera released at the end of the year just passed, the Slovenian philosopher takes the audience through an intellectual journey across the momentous changes and the subsequent upheavals that have shaken the global financial and political system. As ever, his analysis is controversial and yet fascinating. It starts from the protests movements, and goes on touching the widest possible span of issues, from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the rise of China, challenging our understanding of the world order as we (think we) know it.

In the wake of the most severe global crisis of our times, Žižek suggests that the much needed ‘revolutionary change’ will not come about in the form of a miraculous solution. Change is already taking place, and it is manifesting itself though the growing, fast-spreading awareness that the difficulties we are all confronting are neither temporary nor compartmentalised. The current global issues have not been merely caused by some bad, greedy guys operating in an otherwise good system—they are part and parcel of the system itself, and the recent protest movements have clearly shed light on this. Hence, what really matters in this specific conjuncture is not to find fast solutions, but to break what Žižek calls ‘the iconic Fukuyama-taboo’—the so far largely unquestioned “unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism” and its assumed irreplaceability.

From this angle, the very remarkable achievement of the protests lies in the way in which they have exposed how the system is not simply ‘faulty’ and needing fixing but, rather, it is likely to implode— because it has lost its self-evidence and ‘automatic legitimacy’. This is why, in Žižek’s view, it is beyond the remit of protest movements such as ‘Occupy’ to make realistic demands or to suggest for stable solutions to the global crisis. Their truly revolutionary aim has been fulfilled: they have removed the lid of one of the most cumbersome Pandora’s boxes of our age—they have revealed the limits of the “End of History”, and released a large flux of energy of protest in this way. However, Žižek concludes, what the future has in store for us is uncertain, because it will depend on the result of the final and most difficult of the battles— the struggle for who will appropriate such great energy.

To find out more about Žižek’s work, check out our Žižek bundle

Add SI on Twitter and Facebook

This is a reminder that the Sociological Imagination has a presence on facebook. Please do add us as a friend and feel free to get in contact. We’re always open to ideas and suggestions so please don’t hesitate if there’s anything you would like to say!

Sociological Imagination

Follow us on Twitter here:

Twitter News Wire

Twitter Updates

Are you interested in being a Postgraduate Forum Convenor for the British Sociological Association?

Are you interested in being a Postgraduate Forum Convenor?

Our existing team work together to make sure that student members of the Association are kept up-to-date with matters of specific interest to them. They will also facilitate contact between student members and the BSA Council. In return for their hard work and dedication.

Postgraduate Forum Convenors are offered a free place at BSA events and all travel expenses are reimbursed.

The Convenors’ tasks include:

  • Circulating information to other postgraduates via the PG Forum email distribution list
  • Maintaining the PG Forum pages of the BSA website & the Facebook fan page.
  • Supporting and hosting PG Focus podcasts
  • Making contributions to Network
  • Assisting with the processing of BSA Support Fund applications by joining the panel of members who grant awards from the Fund
  • Helping organise the Postgraduate workshops/events at the BSA Annual Conference
  • Representing the interests of Postgraduate members at Council meetings

Since the PG Focus podcasts were launched to great success in 2009, they have become an increasingly important part of the PG Forum activities. We are therefore particularly interested in having someone join us who has knowledge about, or an interest in learning, skills relating to the compiling, editing, uploading, and online maintenance of the blog and PG Focus podcasts.

The successful applicant will work with current convenors to become
proficient at assisting with the online and media aspects of the PG Forum’s activities. The new convenor(s) will also share other duties, including attending on average one Council meeting and two PG Forum meetings per year; quickly and efficiently dealing with email correspondence regarding Support Fund applications and other business; overseeing the organization of a session for the PG Day and spearheading new initiatives that will benefit the PG Forum community.

While the time commitment for this role is flexible, with responsibilities shared between convenors, and the workload varies over the year, applicants can expect to devote between 4 and 16 hours per month to PG Forum
responsibilities.

If you have questions about what being a convenor entails, please contact us at PGForum@britsoc.org.uk

Include a letter explaining why you think you are suitable for this role.
Deadline for applications: 1 March 201

Social Class and Educational Aspiration

The BSA postgraduate forum is sponsoring an event of  Social Class and Educational Aspiration for postgraduates involved in this area of research. The Conference and Workshop will be hosted by the  University of East London On Tuesday 20th and Wednesday 21st  March 2012. The event is structured around five keynote lectures by leading social class and education academics alongside two tutorial PhD workshops, conducted by the academic speakers. Conference abstracts  are sought from 18 postgraduates; eight of whom will be selected to give a 20 minute talk and the rest will be invited to give a poster presentation. There is an option to only give a poster presentation but you must still send an abstract. It is intended that the conference theme is interpreted widely, however the following themes  in relation to social class are of particular interest:

·         Educational aspiration,
·         Educational attainment/achievement,
·         Access to higher education,
·         Recent changes in educational policies,
·         Theoretical and methodological discussions on social class and education.

If you are interested in taking part in this event please see http://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/postgrad.htm   for further details on how to apply. You will need to complete the application form and write an abstract of no more than 250 words on how your research demonstrates a sociological and/or educational critical engagement with social class and education – in particular educational aspiration.

If you have any further queries please contact Jenny and Tamsin at: sceaevent2012@gmail.com .  The deadline for applications is Monday February 6th 2012.  Please note that this event is free for all participants who are BSA members and £25 to all non-BSA members. All participants are expected to be present for the full two days.

Our most popular posts in January

  1. Charles Wright Mills’ Sociological Imagination and why we fail to match it today
  2. Who do you think you are, Richard Sennett???
  3. A Mexican, a Kiwi and a Nigerian walk into a bar… a dose of (sociological) Xmas humour
  4. Review of ‘Tourist Cultures: Identity, Place and the Traveller’
  5. On the Impossibility of Being Original
  6. Spotlight on Asexuality Studies
  7. Car Boot Sale
  8. Imagining the human: new media tools
  9. Sociologists get radical
  10. The Sociology of Hip Hop

The best of Sociological Imagination

Check out what we’ve been making with Bundlr, a new online curation tool:

What do you think? We’re still in the early stages of figuring out Bundlr but expect to see much more of these. We’d also like to get more people involved in the curation: themes to be suggested by readers and then curation for a bundle on that theme would take place through open-ended collaboration?

Prickles and Goo (or Quals versus Quants)

A new video of an old talk by philosopher Alan Watts (1915-1973) perfectly illustrates the falsity of the quantitative vs qualitative sociology divide:

ANNOUNCEMENT: Summer School on Vampires and Vampirism

Apply for this summer school at your own peril!

Euro-Balkan Institute for Social and Humanities Research, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

 

15th OHRID SUMMER UNIVERSITY

2012

Summer School “Vampires and Vampirism:
Between Anthropology, Folklore and Popular Culture”

 

to be held 12th-30th August, Ohrid, Macedonia

- CALL FOR APPLICATIONS -

Deadline for submitting the application: June 15th 2012.

Read more here

 

Nick Crossley on Relational Sociology

In this podcast Mark Carrigan talks to Nick Crossley about his recent book Towards Relational Sociology. The interview covers relational sociology, interdisciplinary approaches to social theory, the future of social theory and the contested status of quantitative methods.

Relational Sociology